Mixed Signals

The latest issue of the Commercial Record illustrates our current problem for sellers and buyers.  If you look at New Haven county for June, the most recent month available, compared to the same month last year, sales are down by 12% and prices for the whole county are up by almost 6%.  If you look just at the shoreline towns and add Woodbridge, to try to capture the higher end of the market, sales are slightly up and prices are down.  Go figure. 

I guess the lesson as a whole is that we can't pay too much attention to what we read in the national press.  Connecticut is following its own, slower, path to recovery.  Our listors at the high end of the market are beginning to accept that there seems to be a ceiling on prices for luxury homes, and that no one can say what a given home is "worth".  We can predict that it won't sell for what the seller thinks it should, given what money is in the house and what the condition is, but we can't find examples that will pinpoint the exact price.  We can't even promise that it will sell at a lower price, nor can we swear that we're not "making a market" by lowering prices, causing low prices to slip lower.  What can we say?  We can tell buyers that it's a great time to buy direct waterfront, or properties over a million dollars.

In other submarkets, the picture is murkier.  The numbers of months of supply in houses has declined, and is now in the range of a balanced market.  That should mean that neither seller or buyer has an advantage.  But, depending upon where you are, and the type of house you have, you could find a bidding war or few showings, with maybe a lowball offer.  However, the only way to test the market is to put the property on at a "fair" price and see. 

There is a bump every fall, when buyers try to close and move before the end of the year, and, this season, it may tell the final tale of 2013.  Let's see what happens.  We do know this--mortgage rates, over the long run, matter much more than a few thousand dollars here or there in the sales price.  So buyers should definitely act, because interest rates have already gone up about 15% from their lowest point, and will likely rise further after the elections.  Time is fleeting--carpe diem!

Sales Around the Country This Spring

It's always interesting for me to visit with my friends from other large independent companies around the country, especially when the market is changing rapidly.  I just got back last night from Charlotte, and the mood from other places is almost giddy.  The feeling nationally is that market activity will be back within 10% of normal levels by the end of this year.  That's a big improvement from the projections we heard only last fall, when most experts thought that historical norms of housing turnover would not return before 2015.

Now the commonly heard complaint is lack of inventory.  There simply aren't enough properties for sale to meet the demand. The average number of months of inventory seems to be about three.  Well-priced, well-maintained homes in many areas get multiple offers--sometimes dozens--within a few days or weeks of being listed.  Once they go under contract, the problem that arises is that appraisals have been lagging, as they always do, so there are issues with mortgages.  In some cases, sellers and their agents are going back to the highest bidder and telling them that they need to release all the contingencies, including mortgage, or they will proceed to the next offer. New construction is hot everywhere.

Here in Connecticut, we're recovering slowly.  (Maybe that's why they call us the Land of Steady Habits?)  We have just over eight months of inventory overall in our county, with some towns much higher than that.  Guilford, for example, has 17 months' supply.  Our supply of million dollar homes will last several years.  So, for us, the report from other places tells us what the future will be like.  And it will be great.  However, if you are a buyer, my advice is to buy right now!

Bidding Wars in Phoenix

Everyone knows that certain parts of the country--the ones that were growing quickly--took the biggest hit in the recent downturn.  Arizona and Nevada, along with Florida, are always mentioned as places with thousands of homes for sale at drastically reduced prices.  Now, things are changing, even in those states.  Today's New York Times has an article about the return of bidding wars to Phoenix.  The story points out that this is not necessarily because prices would have risen on their own, but because the supply is finally drying up, and there is more demand for what's left.  That sounds like a normal explanation of supply and demand to me!

Prices in high-end neighborhoods in and around Phoenix are still dropping, but many of the foreclosures in harder-hit areas have moved through the system, leaving homebuyers with little to choose from.  Even new construction, which is finally picking up, cannot keep up with the pace of demand.  One suburban home, a foreclosed property, had 84 offers before the bank closed off further ones.  This illustrates how a glut of short sales and foreclosures can hold down prices, and what can happen when the flow of such properties ends.  

More Confirmation on Pricing

The lead article in yesterday's New York Times Real Estate section confirmed yet again what real estate practitioners know, but are often unable to convey persuasively to others. It gave examples of sellers who priced their units aggressively in today's market, and kept lowering the prices without success. It contrasted that with sellers who priced so as to seem to be a "good deal", and told about the bidding wars that have been taking place in such cases.

Underlying this phenomenon is a change in the marketplace from the past: Now buyers, who get more information through the Internet and by looking at more places before buying, are more educated about prices than they used to be. They can tell when something is priced to sell, and they know that they have to move quickly. They also know that, often, there will be multiple offers; therefore, if they want to get the property, they may have to bid over the asking price.

This has happened to us so many times that we can all attest to its effectiveness. We cannot, however, seem to convince sellers that they will actually receive higher offers by pricing the property lower. It's not unlike the psychology of pricing store items at sale prices, to stimulate demand and encourage prompt purchases. Of course, the seller can always reject an offer, if it does not meet his or her specifications. The point is to get offers, particularly to get enough offers to assure that fair market value is established.

Separating oneself from the pack is key in this market. Unfortunately for our business, pricing aggressively does that!