As many people may know by now, we have grown so much in our relocation services business that we spun it off and renamed it Pearce Plus, primarily because we use real estate companies other than our own in areas we don't serve (and, in some special circumstances, in our own area as well). We are serving as advisors and administrators for human resource departments about policies and procedures involved in relocating employees from around the world to New Haven, and, increasingly, from one place to another when New Haven isn't either the destination or the point of origination. For example, we may help a company here do a group move from California to Florida. We are also representing many senior living facilities in moving seniors through our Senior Services division, now also under the Pearce Plus banner. These activities are specialized and deserve to be separated out.
Other companies who do what we do are usually independent entities, although often they are under the umbrella of a real estate company (Cartus, for example) and use their own agencies wherever possible. Although our relocation employees operated indepedently, we thought that renaming our services would make the point more clearly to clients and to the public. We chose this point in time because it's so busy now. After a lull, when corporations were all putting their hiring on hold, we are seeing a spurt of new employees coming into the region. Seniors, of course, are often driven to sell by factors other than market timing, so that market is strong as well.
And, we must admit, it's nice to have something positive to report in these gloomy times!
Showing posts with label relocating. Show all posts
Showing posts with label relocating. Show all posts
Monday, November 2, 2009
Monday, March 16, 2009
The Mark-to-Market Rule
You may have been reading about the mark-to-market rule in connection with the travails of the banking world. It applies to real estate in a very unfortunate way, which helps to explain why appraisals are so problematic these days.
Very simply, mark-to-market means that the value of an asset should be governed by what other similar assets are worth. Since most homes are only valued when they are sold, or refinanced, most people would expect to be unaffected by changes in valuation when they are not in the process of selling. However, the current focus on "stress testing" banks, and the influx of the TARP money, has caused regulators to take a new look at the revaluation of assets already on the books of those banks, and revalue them based on the basis of recent transactions or valuations at other banks.
Let's assume that there's a house on your street that went into foreclosure, or even just got sold to a relocation company when the owner moved. Since either of those scenarios would favor a quick sale, it might well have changed hands at what you would consider a rock bottom price. The mark-to-market rule, however, would then dictate that your home is now worth what the relo company sold your neighbor's home for, at least insofar as they are comparable properties.
You can easily see how things can spiral downward from there. If you then had problems with your mortgage, your bank would be carrying the value of your home at the "new" value, making your home further underwater. If every other bank then writes down the homes they have financed on your street, pretty soon everyone is underwater on their mortgages, and the banks have way more in the way of "troubled assets". All this is true even though perhaps only one or two homes changed hands at the lower value, and maybe not even in an arm's length transaction. The next thing you know, another bank is below recommended capital requirements, and is on the endangered list. At that rate, every bank may end up on the list, when the only thing that happened is that one home in a neighborhood got sold at a bargain price. Scary, right?
Very simply, mark-to-market means that the value of an asset should be governed by what other similar assets are worth. Since most homes are only valued when they are sold, or refinanced, most people would expect to be unaffected by changes in valuation when they are not in the process of selling. However, the current focus on "stress testing" banks, and the influx of the TARP money, has caused regulators to take a new look at the revaluation of assets already on the books of those banks, and revalue them based on the basis of recent transactions or valuations at other banks.
Let's assume that there's a house on your street that went into foreclosure, or even just got sold to a relocation company when the owner moved. Since either of those scenarios would favor a quick sale, it might well have changed hands at what you would consider a rock bottom price. The mark-to-market rule, however, would then dictate that your home is now worth what the relo company sold your neighbor's home for, at least insofar as they are comparable properties.
You can easily see how things can spiral downward from there. If you then had problems with your mortgage, your bank would be carrying the value of your home at the "new" value, making your home further underwater. If every other bank then writes down the homes they have financed on your street, pretty soon everyone is underwater on their mortgages, and the banks have way more in the way of "troubled assets". All this is true even though perhaps only one or two homes changed hands at the lower value, and maybe not even in an arm's length transaction. The next thing you know, another bank is below recommended capital requirements, and is on the endangered list. At that rate, every bank may end up on the list, when the only thing that happened is that one home in a neighborhood got sold at a bargain price. Scary, right?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)