An Idea to Move the Market

Much thought and discussion went into the enactment and extension of the first-time homebuyer tax credit, and it clearly impacted the market, both while it was in effect, and after it expired. It moved sales for last year into the first half, and the immediate drop in activity and sales beginning last July proved that it motivated people to buy before it ran out.

Although I have my issues with that credit, both in terms of policy and in practice, there is no question that it made a difference while it was in effect, and that the market responded. It is also clear that the jump start that the government must have hoped that it would give to real estate did not occur, as sales fell off as soon as it was over. In retrospect, I think that the government was right in thinking that we needed that kind of stimulus, and I think we need to try again. After all, cash for clunkers helped the auto industry, the TARP money helped the financial industry, and real estate is still lagging. It is hard to imagine any real recovery taking place without our industry improving.

My problem with the first-time homebuyer credit was that it aimed at exactly the people who would buy in any type of market: those forming households; and renters with no homes to sell. One of the main problems with the current market is that it is stopped up, because sellers who can sell refuse to do so, because they feel that they are losing equity, even though that perceived equity may have been phantom gains.

In order to give an incentive for those who can to sell now, and to buy something else, I propose that the government offer a one-time tax credit for sellers who will lose equity when they sell, on the same terms and up to the same amount as the first-time credit. So, for example, someone who paid $200,000 for her house and now is selling for $180,000 could deduct up to $8000 on her tax bill this year. I believe that the market may now be ready for the jump start that such a program could provide, and that it would help even more than the last incentive, since it would both produce a supply of homes for others to buy, and sales for developers and other sellers when those people buy a new place to live. It's time for bold action, and helping the housing industry would be good for everyone.

The Power of Low Rates

I have a real estate friend in Madison, Wisconsin--where the market seems a lot like ours much of the time--who thinks that the real estate market will not recover unless and until the government aims directly at our industry with programs designed to improve sales. Although the tax credits did that, they expired and left us, arguably, in worse shape than ever (however, people don't realize that, because they look at the fact that housing prices haven't declined much, and in some cases, they have edged up slightly--that's because all the first-time homebuyers have left the market, leaving higher-priced homes as the only ones selling). The government has focused on the banks, using first TARP money and then foreclosure actions to regulate activity. We probably haven't been helped at all by the foreclosure stoppage, since it just lengthens the period of time where the whole housing system is backed up. Until all those homes, which--foreclosed or not--the owners can't afford, get transferred somehow, there won't be a "normal" real estate market. Appraisers can't even use those transfers in computing value, since they aren't arm's-length transactions, but they obviously have an effect on values and on regular sales.

This same friend, although thinking that we need Federal intervention to improve our market, also has the most compelling argument for buying right now. He has made charts that show that a 10% drop in prices actually has less of an effect on monthly payments (the gold standard by which most buyers decide how much they can afford) than a 1% rise in interest rates. Therefore, buying a home now, with the current rates, costs you less than buying it later, even if prices drop by another 10%. If rates go up, that savings in the prices will be more than offset. Whether that obviates the need for governmental action on behalf of the housing industry, I'm not sure. But I am sure that it makes a compelling case for buying a home now.

Interest Rate Update

Now that the weather has moderated a little, we're starting to see some activity in the real estate market. One question on everyone's mind is the forecast for interest rates over the next few months. It's particularly true for those who are refinancing, since some banks allow you to take one "drop" between commitment and closing. Therefore, people want to know whether rates will go down more.

Of course, the correct answer is: Who knows? But I think most betting people feel that the governmental stimulus and drive to improve the economy will result in incentives of every kind that could possibly help the housing market. That would argue for lower rates to come. I don't think they'll be much lower, or for much longer, since banks are paying 5% for the TARP money. So how long can they really afford to loan it out at less than 5%?

So, if they are going to go down to 4 and 1/2, even for a little while, why not wait? The answer to that lies in the fine print. Fannie Mae, which drives a lot of bank lending policy, has quietly been raising the standards on loans. FICO credit scores to qualify for the best rates are rising, and higher rates are imposed when there is a higher loan-to-value ratio being sought. Translation: The rate might be slightly lower for some amount of time, but it will be harder for most people without excellent credit and enough cash for a substantial downpayment to qualify for that rate. When you take those factors into account, you will almost certainly come down on the side of buying or refinancing as soon as possible.

I should point out, in the nature of a disclaimer, that I do not have Obama's private Blackberry address, so these thoughts are my own, based upon reading public materials! And, given all that's going on, I'm sure there will be more news to follow.

Housing and the Federal TARP money

People all want to refinance or take out a new mortgage at the bottom of the market. Well, I wasn't sure before, but, based on what I've learned about the government's stimulus program, the time to get a mortgage is NOW. It turns out that the TARP money being given to banks isn't free. In the same way that the first-time homebuyer's tax credit sounds as though you don't have to pay it back, the TARP money has been characterized as a bailout, leading us to think that the banks are being granted the funds. But we were wrong--they have to pay it back, with 5% interest for the first number of years, and 7% interest after that.

So, while I previously thought that interest rates would just keep being forced down until people bought real estate, I now think we're at--or even past--the rate bottom. If a bank has to use money that it's paying 5% for, how many loans can it make for less than that, or even for the same amount, without incurring losses? In our WP mortgage joint venture with Webster Bank, we've seen rates, which had been at 5% with no points for a 30-year fixed mortgage, start to creep up. That now makes sense to me, and it's a call to action.

As I've said before, what you pay as a mortgage rate will matter more on the margin than what you pay for the property, so, if you have the money to buy a new home, buy it now! By the time you realize that rates are heading up, they will be higher yet.